Deadly House Fire on Gibnut Street Claims Life of Phillip Cattouse

A well-known employee of Pou’s Meat Pie here in Belize City lost his life overnight when the building he was renting on Gibnut Street went up in flames.  The incident happened shortly before the blackout on Wednesday night.  Phillip Cattouse had just returned home and was talking to his landlady about lighting a candle inside his apartment before turning in for the night.  Before long the wooden structure was engulfed in flames and when the fire was extinguished, firemen discovered his charred remains among the debris.  Here’s News Five’s Isani Cayetano with our first story.

 

Isani Cayetano, Reporting

A house fire in Belize City on Wednesday night claimed the life of fifty-one-year-old Philip Cattouse, otherwise known as Cutty, who was renting an apartment on Gibnut Street.  The deadly blaze also destroyed several wooden structures on the property, leaving other tenants displaced in the wake of the incident.  The landlady was inside her home, a concrete bungalow adjacent to the rooms, when she was alerted to the fire next door.  Distraught from what she experienced, the elderly woman spoke with News Five off camera.

 

Voice of: Landlady

Voice of: Landlady

“He came home, look like he was vex and he was railing up, cussing up and thing and I came out and I asked him what he’s railing up for, right.  So he said he’s trying to light a candle.  So I tell, “Noh light no candle.”  I seh, “from I live ya eena dis house”, ih seh, “a neva light no candle.”  Ih she a just di try light wahn candle and I tell ahn noh light di candle.  Ih seh yes, he still wahn try light di candle and I mi di give ahn wahn light, wahn charging light and he seh he noh want that.”

 

According to the property-owner, Cattouse then retired to his room.  It wasn’t until she heard a shuffling from the neighboring apartment that she came out to inquire.

 

Voice of: Landlady

“I came in thinking he was going to out the candle.  I came in and I lay down a little bit and like I hear, you know, like movements out yah.  So when I came out, I saw the door open and it was like, ih look like ih mi di try open di door.  Ih couldn’t get out so ih try open di door.  When I sih dat, I seh well ih mussi come out because I sih di door open.  But after that, I neva sih ahn again, yoh know.  So I couldn’t believe that ih mi deh een deh, you know, trapped eena di fire, you know.”

 

 

Cattouse recently relocated to that apartment in December of last year and befriended his landlady and her children.  The overnight fire completely damaged the wooden structure.  The National Fire Service responded to the call and proceeded to extinguish the fire.

 

On the Phone: Kenneth Mortis

On the Phone: Kenneth Mortis, Station Supervisor, National Fire Service

“Tragedy struck last night when Mr. Phillip Cattouse, fifty-one years old, died as a result of a fire.  A very unfortunate scenario went down last night whereby it left neighbors, it left the fire department baffled as to try and figure out exactly what Mr. Cattouse could have done to cause his little cabin, his little palace to go up in flames, claiming his life.  [From] what we gathered, we know that the fourteen-by-twenty-four structure that was divided into three eight-foot compartments.  Mr. Cattouse occupied the first of the three structures, that was where the fire started.”

 

 

This afternoon, Station Supervisor Kenneth Mortis told News Five that the fire began shortly before the blackout that blanketed the city last night.

 

Phillip Cattouse

On the Phone: Kenneth Mortis

“We know that the fire actually occurred before the shortage of electricity happened.  That was roughly two minutes to eleven [o’clock].  He had retired from work and after probably socializing, having some beverages, he probably had one too many whereby it was reported that he was using a candle as a means of light and somehow he apparently fell asleep with this candle burning.  The curtain got a whiff of the flame and consumed the structure, thus causing fire damage to the three apartment complex, the neighboring structure in the yard and, of course, took his life.”

 

 

Cattouse’s landlady, who is disabled, recounts having to evacuate her grandchildren from the family home as the fire consumed the apartment building.

 

Voice of: Landlady

“It was last night, I had was to tend to my two granddaughters, tek them out of the house and try get them to somewhere safe, you know.  One of them is eight years old and one of them is six years old and only me and them were in the house, in my house.  I was trying to get them to safety.”

 

Isani Cayetano

“That must have been a frightening experience, right?”

 

Landlady

“Yes, very… because I’ve never been through this experience before, you know.”

 

 

Isani Cayetano

“How are you dealing with it knowing that your tenant lost his life?”

 

 

Landlady

“I can’t take it, I cannot take it.  My head is hurting.  I couldn’t even sleep.  My hearts pains me and I’m nervous right now.”

 

Phillip “Cutty” Cattouse was well-known from his job with Pou’s Meatpie here in Belize City. Isani Cayetano for News Five.

President of Senate States Position on Standing Orders

Last week, Senator Michael Peyrefitte publicly criticized the Briceño Administration for what he interpreted as a breach of the Senate’s Standing Orders. Today, Carolyn Trench-Sandiford, the President of the Senate, announced her position on the matter. As we reported, Senator Peyrefitte contended that the standing orders stipulate that the lead senator for government business must be a minister. Senator Eamon Courtenay remains the lead senator for government business, in spite of his recent resignation as a government minister. President Sandiford sought the legal opinion of Attorney General Anthony Sylvester. That opinion was made public on Wednesday and this morning, the President of the Senate leaned on the AG’s legal opinion to state her position.

 

                 Carolyn Trench-Sandiford

Carolyn Trench-Sandiford, President of the Senate

“In ruling on the matter I requested a legal opinion from the Honorable Anthony Sylvester, the Attorney General and principle legal advisor to the Government of Belize by virtue of section forty-two of the constitution. Based on his advice and my own considerations, I am satisfied that there is no need for the leader of government business in the Senate to be a minister or member of cabinet. The standing order makes a clear distinction between the minster and senator in charge of government business and bills, motions, resolutions or papers may be presented by the senator in charge of government business and debated by the Senate even when such senator is not a minister.”

Senator Peyrefitte Disagrees With AG’s Legal Opinion on Lead Government Senator

Following today’s Senate meeting, we asked U.D.P. Senator Michael Peyrefitte if he agrees with the Attorney General and the President of the Senate’s position on his legal query about having a lead senator for government business who is not a minister. As would be expected, Senator Peyrefitte says he disagrees with the AG’s legal opinion. Notwithstanding the opposing legal position, Senator Peyrefitte and a full complement of U.D.P. Senators were present at today’s sitting.

 

Michael Peyrefitte, U.D.P. Senator

“Well, I don’t agree with the legal opinion nor the president’s position. But, that is her ruling and I respect the institution so I will respect the ruling, but the party reserves the right to see what other steps it will take from here on out after consideration concerning the issue. I want to leave it at that. I wrote to her and she wrote me back and I respect her for that, unlike the prime minister who doesn’t answer me. She wrote me back and gave me her answer. Now we will look at it as a party and determine where we go from here, but I don’t agree with it.”

 

Paul Lopez

“Your thought on the prime minister’s response to your concern?”

 

Michael Peyrefitte

“I think I addressed that already, I said bad precedents don’t make good law. Not because you did something a while ago that was not correct and it was not checked or corrected means that if you do it now it can’t be wrong. I still stand by my opinon that the leader of government business has to be a minister, but the president has ruled that way. And, the opinion of the AG is kinda incorrect in terms of some factual things they claim to be facts, as it relates to Fred Martinez and Dickie Bradley. But, like I said the matter will be presented to the party and the party will determine where it wants to go from here.”

Senator Eamon Courtenay Explains His “Cabinet Privileges”

And, we also heard from Eamon Courtenay, the Lead Senator for Government Business. He explained how he is able to function in his role as a senator after resigning as a government minister. Senator Courtenay did not wish to discuss his resignation. He noted, however, that the prime minister has already spoken on the matter. Nonetheless, he confirmed that he maintains Cabinet privileges as a result of his position in the Senate.

 

Eamon Courtenay, Lead Government Senator

“As usual whenever Michael Peyrefitte raises anything it is mischief. He either misinforms himself or fails to understand. Even when it was pointed out to him that the standing order he was referring to is not applicable, he still persisted in writing to the president. It served an opportunity, one for the Senate to get advice from the attorney general for the legal position. The legal position is very clear, the standing orders makes a distinction between ministers on the one hand and leaders of government business on the other hand. There is no requirement that the leader for government business be a minister, be a member of Cabinet. That is very clear from the standing orders and the president explained all of that this morning. Secondly, as I have said, Fred Martinez, Doug Singh, same position, they were not in Cabinet but they were leaders of government business. So there is nothing new about this happening. It is just the usual mischief from mike.”

 

Paul Lopez

“Outside of your ministerial position now, how do you become informed or aware of the government’s or Cabinet’s intentions behind a bill or a motion?”

 

Eamon Courtenay

“Right, so that is why in the press release, when the prime minister announced my resignation, they used the phrase Cabinet privilege. The tradition and convention well establish that as has happened with other, the leader for government business is invited to Cabinet when there is major legislation being debated, discussed in Cabinet so that you can know, when it comes to the Senate, what the government’s thinking is. Since the end of December when I left Cabinet, I have not been to single Cabinet meeting because there has not been any major legislation that my presence needs to be there so that I can participate in the debate and understand it. But, the idea is whenever there is a major piece of legislation I will be invited the Cabinet, assuming I can make it, I will attend to make sure I understand what government policy is behind the legislation.”

Government Updates Media on Draft Maya Land Policy

This morning, representatives of various media houses met for breakfast with the Minister of Indigenous People’s Affairs and her senior staff, including C.E.O.’s Adele Catzim and Marconi Leal Junior.  Also present was Senior Counsel Andrew Marshalleck and Assistant Solicitor General Samantha Matute-Tucker on behalf of the Office of the Attorney General.  The purpose of the breakfast meeting was for the Government of Belize to provide an update on where it is in respect of the draft Maya Customary Land Tenure Policy.  Following a demand by the collective Maya communities that government consults with them in their respective villages, Minister Dolores Balderamos-Garcia announced today that they will be visiting all forty-one indigenous communities to meet with villagers regarding the draft policy.  She also explained that the Office of Indigenous People’s Affairs had already scheduled a public consultation in Punta Gorda Town prior to the mass gathering in Santa Elena on January twenty-seventh.

 

                Dolores Balderamos-Garcia

Dolores Balderamos-Garcia, Minister of Indigenous People’s Affairs

“Yes, we do intend, it will set back the process, as senior counsel has said, but we do intend to reach out in going back to the villages because I think that in responding to the political reality, because there is pressure, senior counsel and Samantha [Matute] can speak to the legal aspect, I have to try to address the political reality.  We do intend to go back to as many villages as we possibly can, even if we have to bring some of them together.  But I want to clarify a misconception that the government was not responsive to the call of the people to visit their villages when we held the latest consultations in January.  Those consultations were planned well in advance, the latest iteration of the policy was shared from early December. What basically happened is that the plans for the consultation that Saturday and Sunday were already in place long before, when all of a sudden a few letters started to come in to the Office of Indigenous People’s Affairs in Punta Gorda, saying, “We noh di cohn da PG.  We want unu come to Santa Elena.”  And clearly, it was not a situation that the government could have responded to in any kind of responsible approach because had, well, I don’t want to use the word capitulated, but had we said okay, we’ll go to Santa Elena, we would have met twenty busloads of people with placards that had been prepared for them, saying, “Remember, you have to come back to us for your vote.”  turning the entire situation completely political.”

Is the Mayan Community Properly Informed on Draft Land Policy?

The controversial, provisional document put forward by the Ministry of Indigenous People’s Affairs has been met with cold water by the wider Maya community with one alcalde openly trashing the draft land tenure policy.  With the Government of Belize on one side of the divisive issue and the Toledo Alcaldes Association/Maya Leaders Alliance on the other side, are the masses of residents in Toledo District properly informed of what’s taking place?  That’s what we asked Senior Counsel Andrew Marshalleck earlier today.

 

                    Andrew Marshalleck

Andrew Marshalleck SC, Attorney-at-law

“I see certain Mayan villages claiming interest to land that third parties and other Mayan villages and other Belizean villages also claim interest to that space and I see everybody looking to the government to find a solution to that problem.  I don’t see it as a race for popularity as between MLA and TAA and the government.  The government must act responsibly and has a responsibility to each and every one of those persons who will be affected, including the Maya people, and they have been.  There are, as I have repeatedly said, we acknowledge that there is a historical moral imperative to correct certain wrongs, to try to correct certain wrongs done to the Maya people.  That is so, we accept that, but in correcting those wrongs, we can’t create another one.  There are other interests in that space and everybody has to be considered fairly.  The history is one thing, yes, but what exists today on the ground is what we must look to and try to resolve. Now it’s fundamentally untrue to say you’re being confined to one kilometer.  First off, and you will recognize this right away, a one kilometer radius means the actual diameter is two kilometers, it’s not one.  So from outer boundary to outer boundary is two kilometers.  From the center to the outer boundary is one.  What has been described is a radius, so when you hear language like that, that I am being confined to one kilometer, corralling the Maya people like hogs and all of that, that’s designed to inflame.  It’s not designed to paint the correct picture of what it is… well this is why I am trying to address it, but I am trying to address it in fairly neutral terms because I don’t want to engage in any inflammatory back and forth on it.  So, first off, recognize that what has been stated is a radius, it’s not the diameter.  The diameter is actually two times the radius.”

Senator Peyrefitte Does Not Expect Response to FOIA Letter from PM

At the adjournment of today’s Senate meeting, we asked Senator Michael Peyrefitte if he has received a response from the prime minister. As we have reported, Peyrefitte wrote to Prime Minister John Briceño requesting further details on the government’s reacquisition of the Port of Belize Limited. Senator Peyrefitte requested the names of any private individuals that the government may have contracted to aid in the process. He also requested information on how much they were paid from the public coffers. Here is what Peyrefitte told us.

 

Michael Peyrefitte, U.D.P. Senator

“In short, no he has not responded. He has not gotten it to me. I checked my email. I checked my PO box, I have checked everywhere, the National Assembly. There is no letter here for me. But it would not be surprising if he does not respond. He has a tendency to not respond to legitimate questions from the people answers that he should give and it should be fairly easy to give. I don’t see what the difficulty there. I don’t expect him to respond because he doesn’t respect the law. He hasn’t responded to my last three or four questions, which indicates that he doesn’t care. He doesn’t feel like he needs to respect the law or uphold the law. So we will see what happens.”

Senate Debates Amendment to Criminal Code Act

Inside the National Assembly chamber, senators debated amendments to the Criminal Code and Summary Jurisdiction Acts. The proposed amendments seek to increase jail time for individuals who interfere with the work of law enforcement officers. Lead U.D.P. Senator, Michael Peyrefitte, raised concerns over the definitions of certain offenses outlined in the legislation, such as indecent words and behavior. NGO Senator Janelle Chanona also weighed in on the proposed amendment. These contributions prompted a response from Senator Eamon Courtenay. Here is how that discussion played out.

 

Michael Peyrefitte, U.D.P. Senator

“I have great issue with the summary jurisdiction amendment. If you read it carefully madam president, what this is saying pretty much is that I don’t even have to threaten a public officer. I don’t even have to threaten a peace officer, all that peace officer has to do is determine that what I say in my own yard, amongst my own friends, drinking rum, that I can go jail for that. That is what I find completely and utterly unacceptable. It says, any person who uses, I am reading from the news section four (a), any person who uses any threatening, abusive, profane, obscene, and this is where you really lose me, indecent, because who defines indecent. What might be indecent to you might not be indecent to me, especially if I am in my home, if I am in my yard.”

 

                          Janelle Chanona

Janelle Chanona, NGO Senator

“We fully support the direction of this bill, but calls out that I don’t know if this is the open and shut to it. And I know we have some other pieces of legislation in the works. We would like to signal that sexual harassment on a whole currently should definitely be treated with the seriousness it deserves. As stated earlier, it is also critically important to define what is meant by terms. Because, what I might consider sexual harassment and indecent others may not consider indecent and what is culturally tolerated, if not encouraged behavior is so intrinsic sometimes we lose sight of what that is and that becomes blurred.”

 

                   Eamon Courtenay

Eamon Courtenay, Lead Government Senator

“What Senator Peyrefitte described, drinking and having a barbeque with his friends, behaving the way he usually behave, he will be guilty of an offense today. Let us look at what the bill proposes, we are going to repeal the provision I just read. Now recall what I read; the law as it stand today does not have any categories. Anybody who does these things and anybody who hears it anywhere is an offense. There are now these limiting words, if you do it in the hearing of a person acting as a judicial officer, legal officer and peace officer. Not a police officer walking down the road. He has to be performing his duties and this happens, then an offense is committed.”

Should Law Obligate Grandfathers to Care for Grandchildren in Absence of Father?

An amendment to the Families and Children Act, stemming from a recent High Court ruling, seeks to mandate that a grandfather care for his grandchildren if the father of that child neglects his responsibility. The proposed amendment caused a great deal of concerns and questions among senators. Several parliamentarians referred to the proposed amendment as unfair. Here is how that debate played out.

 

Eamon Courtenay, Lead Government Senator

“Respect of the grandchild, it is only where the father or mother of the child is ill cannot be located or are unable to maintain themselves. So, a father must maintain his child. With respect to the grandchildren, that obligation rest on the mother and father to maintain that child, however if that mother or father is ill, cannot be located, or unable to maintain themselves then it is the grandfather obligation to maintain is imposed. This comes out of a decision of the Supreme Court. And so the law is being clarified that the obligation of the grandfather is not forever and always it is only if the parent cannot maintain the child in these circumstances.”

 

                    Michael Peyrefitte

Michael Peyrefitte, Lead U.D.P. Senator

“I according to this, I have a child and no matter how hard some parents try, sometimes your children don’t turn out they way they should turn out. So now me, I am eighty-five now and I can only run five miles now as opposed to the ten I run today. I am receiving a pension and small social security and my son who is not able to maintain himself, he has three four children that he is not able to maintain, that falls on me, as an elderly grandfather with limited means? You get to same problem. How can you expect people to take on the responsibilities of another human being? The great Dean Lindo once coined a phrase, if you dead deh nuh wah bury me.”

 

                     Janelle Chanona

Janelle Chanona, NGO Senator

“When you get into the issue of fairness, to segue from Senator Herrera’s comments, then it also raises a dynamic well for the state and the tax payer, is it “fair” that children are born to the mercy of the world, abandoned by everybody and then the tax payer has to meet the needs of those children? I have stood in this honorable house before and said we don’t talk about sex and it is a national fact that men and women are having sex and having children and it is costing us in multiple ways. We spoke about keeping children in schools. The trauma of some of these experiences, these homes these children are coming from because they are born into relationships to keep financial ties to a man, men who has thirty children, forty-five children.”

Senate Debates Change to Mandatory School Age

The Government of Belize is changing the mandatory school age from fourteen to sixteen-years old. An amendment to the Education Rules was passed in the House of Representatives and debated in the Senate this morning. The primary objective of the change is to decrease the nation’s school dropout rate and increase enrollment in primary and high school. The amendment was supported by the Senate, but some senators had reservations about its implementation.

 

                          Jamal Swaso

Jamal Swaso, U.D.P. Senator

“These amendments from our side, we welcome it because as a developing nation these changes are needed if you want to build a great foundation for our nation. We need to increase the captured audience that we can use through the education system to get them into school. I would like the government to consider several things, before we move forward with this great effort. Has the government taken into consideration the additional resources needed to be effective and capture these students we now have? We have to take into consideration we do not have enough schools, dilapidated schools, we do not have sufficient teachers, we need more psychosocial support for these students who will be in these classrooms.”

 

                          Elena Smith

Elena Smith, NTUCB Senator

“We believe that moving the age from fourteen to sixteen is good for the country because we are looking at ensuring that more of our students and population has a certain level of education and can function in our society. And that is a good thing. However, these things do come with its setbacks. As a teacher of thirty-eight years I understand we can see where students who remain in our primary school system for longer than they should so if we had the primary school age will be fourteen, we do have a few students who are older than fourteen in the primary school students. These are students who are not particularly academically inclined.”

 

                             Bevinton Cal

Bevinton Cal, P.U.P. Senator

“I listened to Senator Swaso earlier and his comments. He made some valid comments but it also makes me wonder as a young person where he is at, because him and I are from the south and just at his backyard, if he would do his research before coming here, on the last budget we approved moneys for the education uplifment program or what we refer to as free education. In his backyard at the Delille Academy, that program has enrolled. In his backyard again, George Town Technical High, that free education is also rolling. At the ITVET, just in November the Prime Minister announced that they will be investing one point three million dollars at the ITVET in Stann Creek.”

Exit mobile version