Future of Taegar-Panton and Alliance for Democracy in UDP Uncertain After Court Ruling

With the High Court’s decision now public, questions loom about the future of Tracy Taegar-Panton and the Alliance for Democracy within the U.D.P. Justice Hondora made it clear that Taegar-Panton’s status should be decided by the party, not the court, as her expulsion was deemed improper. This leaves the U.D.P. with the task of determining her standing. Barrow shared his thoughts on the matter.

 

Shyne Barrow, Claimant

“We will meet and we will talk and see how colleagues feel about moving forward and if there is any room for reconciliation. But I believe now is a moment of reflection for Tracy and Co. They need to atone, they need to be contrite. What they did to this party was not just unconstitutional, it was criminal. It was corrupt. It’s why Saldivar was designated significantly corrupt. These are the types of people. So their involvement in the UDP really depends on them deleting that hubristic energy that they’ve been demonstrating over the last thirty days.”

 

Reporter

“So what now happens in your mind with Tracy Panton?”

 

Shyne Barrow

“Well, obviously, we will discuss it as a party.  We will discuss it as a central executive, we will discuss it as an NPC but I know, even some of my colleagues that were prepared to give her a chance, they were woefully disappointed with the behavior. As you saw, Lee Mark said that if you don’t like it, you get off the ship, well now they have no ship. They are free to do as everyone has been encouraging them to do which is form their own party, the Alliance for Democracy Party as we had all along been saying.”