Panton Alleges Election Fraud Ran Rampant at the General Elections

After a significant defeat in the 2025 General Election, Opposition Leader Tracy Taegar-Panton is promising a new path forward for the United Democratic Party. At today’s press conference, Panton outlined the party’s plan to step into leadership in 2025. However, she claims the loss wasn’t entirely fair, alleging several instances of election fraud on March twelfth. While the party isn’t requesting an election petition, these claims have been filed with the necessary authorities. Panton is determined to lead the U.D.P. with a fresh vision and renewed energy.

 

Tracy Taegar-Panton, Leader of the Opposition

“There was no accountability even by our judicial. System and no respect for the judiciary under this administration. And of course, we can’t forget the abuse of the election processes and mechanisms. So I will tell you my experience in Albert. Where almost all voters who showed up to the poll in blue shirts were disabled and needed assistance to mark their ex on the ballot. Able able-bodied men and women who I have interacted with on the campaign trail all of a sudden. Was not able to read, was not able to see, was not able to write for the promise of somewhere between 250 to $500. I witness that with my own two eyes. And had I not been stationary, literally at the pause on election day, no one could have guessed what my faith could have been. We cannot and we will not move forward as a nation without addressing the blatant election fraud that marred the March twelfth elections. While it can be said that over the years both political parties have made mistakes in raising the voters expectations during the election season, what we witness from the ruling People’s United party in these last elections, my friends, crossed every line, every line of decency, integrity, and respect for our electorate. Of course, there was expansion of fraud during the transfer period. We all know the case of Cayo North that has been fully documented and presented not only to the magistrate court, to the lower court, but to the high court. Let me tell you how blatant it got. Even a single bedroom starter home was used repeatedly to facilitate voucher padding. With the registration of dozens, and when I tell you dozens of voters at that address within three days, given that address verification is a requirement under the representation of a people’s act, this raises serious legal and procedural red flags. And then of course there was tampering with the voters list. Even though, as I said before, the matter of fraud, fraudulent voters was taken to the court. Many of these illegal registrations made it onto the voters list.”