Belize - Belize News - - Great Belize Productions - Belize Breaking News
Home » Featured, Miscellaneous, People & Places » Bar Association says remove 3rd offensive clause from 9th Amendment
Aug 25, 2011

Bar Association says remove 3rd offensive clause from 9th Amendment

The Council of Churches has played a major role in the government’s removal of certain ouster clauses that bars access to the courts in the proposed ninth amendment. But the Bar Association of Belize, another powerful group, is maintaining its position against the ninth. In a release today, the Bar recognizes the Church’s efforts, but says that only two of the three offensive provisions were removed and that the third also needs to be struck out.  The release points out that the government has not agreed to delete the proposed amendment to Section two, which is the supreme law clause of the constitution or the remainder of the proposed section sixty-nine (nine). According to the Bar, the bill even after the revisions still seeks to amend section two and section sixty-nine to provide that amendments to the constitution by the legislature will not be capable of being found to be inconsistent with the constitution. The release says, “Essentially the legislature can pass any amendment to the constitution that it wishes and so long as government in doing so, complies with the procedural requirements under section sixty-nine of the Constitution, the amendment must stand.” The Bar goes on to urge the government not to amend Sections two and Section sixty-nine until the Caribbean Court of Justice has determined a definitive interpretation of the supreme law clause.

Viewers please note: This Internet newscast is a verbatim transcript of our evening television newscast. Where speakers use Kriol, we attempt to faithfully reproduce the quotes using a standard spelling system.

Advertise Here

1 Response for “Bar Association says remove 3rd offensive clause from 9th Amendment”

  1. CEO says:

    The authority and power of the supreem court and/or the highest court with jurisdiction should never be diminished by any constitutional amendments. Judicial review should always be allwed at any and every step or any amendments or formation of new laws. I am not suggesting to make it mandetory but the option should be written into the law rather than be writtien out of the law. We can only hope that our leaders are wise enough that every change or amendment to the constitution would not need a judicial review but that right should be there.

    Hey politicians have been known to make bad decisions! Why do you think as a country we are in the position we are today?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login